“Our past statements made over 5 years ago about abolishing the Division of Energy do not reflect my present thinking. In fact , after being briefed on so many of the vital functions from the Department of Energy, I regret suggesting its elimination, ” he stated in his opening statement at their confirmation hearing on Thursday.
On the issue of weather change, Perry said he can make decisions based on sound science, particularly when people’s lives are at stake yet admitted to Senator Bernie Sanders that he doesn’t view weather change as a crisis nor will he believe that the U. T. should take the lead in changing its energy supply away from non-renewable fuels.
To highlight their ability to make decisions based on technology Perry pointed to a time whenever he was governor of TX and scientists told him that the hurricane was coming and that one particular million people could die because of it.
“Individuals are sobering moments in an individual’s life,” he mentioned, adding that he immediately began attempts to evacuate the people who would become effected.
But the storm didn’ t hit and people failed to lose their lives, which means that TX taxpayers must have spent a fair amount of cash protecting citizens from something that by no means occurred.
“That will data happened to be unfortunately wrong for your particular storm,” he mentioned, “but the point is We made a decisions based on the many sound science I could find.”
“Probably They Will Forget They Said That”
At the heart of their testimony was Perry’ s perception in technology. He has great wish that the U. S. can resolve energy issues through research and development. This individual pointed to the national labs (Sandia National Lab, National Alternative energy Lab, Idaho National Lab, Argonne National Lab and others) plus universities as great places meant for public-private partnerships in research.
He was also clear that will research should be conducted on almost all forms of energy and that he facilitates an “all of the above” power policy.
“Personally i think positive that some scientist, a few incredibly capable man or woman either on the DOE or at one of our own universities or laboratories has technologies to be able to use coal in a way that will be friendly,” he said.
Perry was asked frequently during the hearing to comment on latest reports that the Trump administration can drastically cut the DOE’ h budget, eliminating the Office of Energy Effectiveness and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office associated with Electricity and Office of Non-renewable fuels. He said he would fight to help keep them going.
“I will be in the room suggesting for these types of things,” this individual said.
“I’ m not going to tell you I’ meters going to be 1000 percent productive but I can assure you — and people who know me and that have worked with me know — associated with my commitment to making sound technology, economic science connected together mainly because at the end of the day they make great economic feeling and great quality of life. ”
Senator Hirono of The hawaiian islands also asked about the Trump changeover team’s announcement that it would belly the DOE.
“It’s hard to see how we can go after an ‘ all of the above’ technique if so much of the department’ h ‘ all of the above’ capabilities are usually eliminated, ” she said. Incorporating, “My question is, do you assistance these cuts? ”
“Well, Senator, maybe they’ll possess the same experience I had and neglect that they had said that, ” stated Perry.
Federal government Funding for Research but Not Company
Clean power companies enjoyed a large amount of support in the form of grants and loan ensures under Obama. According to a Whitehouse. gov fact sheet, President Obama made the largest single investment within clean energy in history under the American Recuperation and Reinvestment act . By means of it, he provided more than $90 billion in strategic clean power investments and tax incentives to advertise job creation and the deployment associated with low-carbon technologies. That level of federal government support for clean energy will likely end.
Perry caused it to be clear that he believes the declares should set their own energy objectives and set aside their own funds to back up them.
Hirono, who’ s state has the most intense renewable energy goal in the nation from 100 percent renewables by 2045, inquired if he would support a nationwide renewable energy standard to which he stated no .
“If you are going to leave it up towards the states, will you at least continue to assistance states efforts in these areas, ” she asked.
“Absolutely, said Perry.
“I will talk to any chief excutive about the wisdom of using their educational institutions, using the private sector, using the Section of Energy where it fits to generate the technologies that moves ahead their states positions from the perspective of renewables…. and I’ll be pleased to give them a roadmap on how to accomplish that.”